Samsung Galaxy A16 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
27.1Performance64.4
34.4Display43.7
30.1Camera55.7
43.7Battery60.8
49.3Features60
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G11 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+37) and camera (+26). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
- 43% higher Pixel density: 385 ppi vs 269 ppi
- 39% lower thickness: 7.9 mm vs 12.9 mm
- 35% lower weight: 200 g vs 309 g
- 30% higher Front camera: 13 MP vs 10 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 44 vs 34
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 60 vs 49
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 10 ″+49% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi+43% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | 733 nits | 1,600 nits+118% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 510,132Bottom 3% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 211,597Bottom 7% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 43,559Bottom 3% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 110,374Bottom 3% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 144,602Bottom 2% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 728Bottom 13% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,943Bottom 13% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 96 %Top 47% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 12 MP+140% |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 13 MP+30% | 10 MP |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh+12% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W+80% |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 200 g+35% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm+39% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs HONOR X6cVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs OnePlus N6xVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs POCO C85VSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs realme C63VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS