Samsung Galaxy A17 4G vs ZTE Blade A76 5G
28Performancechip27.9
34.4Display43.8
41.9Camera29
43.7Battery49.1
49.3Features46.7
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A17 4G3 spec wins — ZTE Blade A76 5G
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Samsung Galaxy A17 4G scores 37.3 against 37.4 for ZTE Blade A76 5G. Pick by the categories that matter to you — ZTE Blade A76 5G edges ahead in display and battery, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Stronger camera score: 42 vs 29
- 63% higher Front camera: 13 MP vs 8 MP
- 47% higher Pixel density: 385 ppi vs 262 ppi
- 33% higher RAM (max): 8 GB vs 6 GB
Reasons to pick the ZTE Blade A76 5G
- Stronger display score: 44 vs 34
- Stronger battery score: 49 vs 44
- Has 5G — the other doesn't
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | ZTE Blade A76 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.75 ″+1% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 720x1612 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi+47% | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 687 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | — | 89.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | ZTE Blade A76 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Unisoc T8300 |
| AnTuTu | 547,742Bottom 2% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 210,770Bottom 4% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 45,029Bottom 3% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 142,060Bottom 8% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 149,883Bottom 2% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 732Bottom 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,966Bottom 15% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 98 %Top 40% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 128GB |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | ZTE Blade A76 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | — |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP+63% | 8 MP |
| OIS | Yes | — |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | ZTE Blade A76 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | ZTE Blade A76 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 190 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm+9% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Frame material | Plastic | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | ZTE Blade A76 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | No | — |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | ZTE Blade A76 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | — |
| OS update pledge | 6 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | ZTE Blade A76 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A17 4Gvs OPPO K13x 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A17 4Gvs POCO X6 NeoVSSamsung Galaxy A17 4Gvs Samsung Galaxy A18 4GVSSamsung Galaxy A17 4Gvs Samsung Galaxy XCover7 ProVSZTE Blade A76 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy A07 5GVSZTE Blade A76 5Gvs TECNO SPARK 40VSZTE Blade A76 5Gvs Motorola Moto G (2025)VSZTE Blade A76 5Gvs OPPO K13x 5GVS