Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
27Performance64.4
36.4Display43.7
41.9Camera55.7
43.7Battery60.8
38.7Features60
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)10 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 36.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+37) and features (+21). Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
- 47% higher Pixel density: 396 ppi vs 269 ppi
- 37% lower weight: 195 g vs 309 g
- 36% lower thickness: 8.3 mm vs 12.9 mm
- 30% higher Front camera: 13 MP vs 10 MP
- Lower launch price: $249 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 44 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 60 vs 39
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.5 ″ | 10 ″+54% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi+47% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,600 nits+60% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 555,354 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 730Bottom 13% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,010Bottom 18% | — |
| RAM (max) | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Storage options | 128GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 12 MP+140% |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 13 MP+30% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh+12% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W+80% |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 195 g+37% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm+36% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | — | IP48 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 13 (One UI 5.1) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)vs OPPO A60VSSamsung Galaxy A24 (4G)vs HONOR X6eVSSamsung Galaxy A24 (4G)vs Motorola Moto G (2025)VSSamsung Galaxy A24 (4G)vs POCO C85 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS