Samsung Galaxy A26 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
43.2Performance64.4
44.9Display43.7
41.9Camera55.7
43.7Battery60.8
65.3Features60
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A26 5G8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 45.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+21) and battery (+17). Samsung Galaxy A26 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
- Stronger features score: 65 vs 60
- 43% higher Pixel density: 385 ppi vs 269 ppi
- 40% lower thickness: 7.7 mm vs 12.9 mm
- 35% lower weight: 200 g vs 309 g
- 30% higher Front camera: 13 MP vs 10 MP
- Lower launch price: $300 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 43
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 44
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 200% higher Optical zoom: 3 x vs 1 x
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 10 ″+49% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi+43% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,600 nits+60% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 754,064Bottom 20% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 294,711Bottom 22% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 87,552Bottom 17% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 138,545Bottom 10% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 233,256Bottom 24% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 512GB/1TB |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 1 x | 3 x+200% |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 13 MP+30% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh+12% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W+80% |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 200 g+35% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm+40% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP67 | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A26 5Gvs Huawei P40 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A26 5Gvs Moto G85 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A26 5Gvs POCO X6VSSamsung Galaxy A26 5Gvs Redmi Note 14 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS