Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
20Performance64.4
36Display43.7
33.1Camera55.7
38.8Battery60.8
38.7Features60
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)11 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+44) and camera (+23). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
- 100% higher Front camera: 20 MP vs 10 MP
- 53% higher Pixel density: 411 ppi vs 269 ppi
- 40% lower weight: 184 g vs 309 g
- 35% lower thickness: 8.4 mm vs 12.9 mm
- Lower launch price: $279 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 20
- Stronger display score: 44 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 33
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 60 vs 39
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.4 ″ | 10 ″+56% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi+53% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,600 nits+100% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 260,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 410Bottom 3% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,320Bottom 2% | — |
| RAM (max) | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Storage options | 64GB / 128GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP+213% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 20 MP+100% | 10 MP |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh+12% |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 45 W+200% |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 184 g+40% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm+35% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | — | IP48 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Infinix SMART 9VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs iPhone XRVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs realme Note 70VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Redmi Note 9 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS