Samsung Galaxy M35 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
28.9Performance64.4
44.4Display43.7
41.9Camera55.7
53.1Battery60.8
70.7Features60
5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy M35 5G7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 43.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+36) and camera (+14). Samsung Galaxy M35 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G
- Stronger features score: 71 vs 60
- 45% higher Pixel density: 390 ppi vs 269 ppi
- 30% higher Front camera: 13 MP vs 10 MP
- 29% lower thickness: 9.1 mm vs 12.9 mm
- 28% lower weight: 222 g vs 309 g
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 53
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M35 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.6 ″ | 10 ″+52% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi+45% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,600 nits+60% |
| Screen-to-body | 83.8 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M35 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M35 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 13 MP+30% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M35 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,000 mAh+7% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W+80% |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M35 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 222 g+28% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm+29% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | — | IP48 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M35 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M35 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M35 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy M35 5Gvs Infinix HOT 50 Pro+VSSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy S21VSSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvs TECNO POVA Slim 5GVSSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvs Moto G55 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS