Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
29.1Performance64.4
55.1Display43.7
56.4Camera55.7
41.7Battery60.8
73.3Features60
5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+35) and battery (+19). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 55 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
- 84% higher Pixel density: 496 ppi vs 269 ppi
- 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
- 37% lower thickness: 8.1 mm vs 12.9 mm
- Lower launch price: $1,299 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 29
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 42
- 85% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 108 MP
- 80% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 25 W
- 45% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.9 ″
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 10 ″+45% |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 496 ppi+84% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,500 nits | 1,600 nits+7% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 500,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Bottom 22% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Bottom 27% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP+85% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 12 MP+20% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 5 x+67% | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | — |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,600 mAh+24% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W+80% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 208 g+33% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm+37% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Stainless steel | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS