Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
29.1Performance64.4
54Display43.7
65.9Camera55.7
55.1Battery60.8
73.3Features60
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 51.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+35) and battery (+6). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 54 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 56
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
- 380% higher telephoto: 48 MP vs 10 MP
- 300% higher Front camera: 40 MP vs 10 MP
- Lower launch price: $1,399 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 29
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 55
- 85% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 108 MP
- 45% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.9 ″
- 33% higher Peak brightness: 1,600 nits vs 1,200 nits
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 10 ″+45% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 511 ppi+90% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,600 nits+33% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 500,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Bottom 22% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Bottom 27% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP+85% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 48 MP+380% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 4 x+33% | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | — |
| Front camera | 40 MP+300% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh+12% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 222 g+28% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm+32% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Infinix NOTE EdgeVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 30VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Google Pixel 7 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Xiaomi Mi 11VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS