Samsung Galaxy S24+ vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
61.1Performance64.4
66.7Display43.7
47.3Camera55.7
62.3Battery60.8
94.7Features60
5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S24+4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S24+ wins this phone face-off, 63 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+35) and display (+23). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S24+
- Stronger display score: 67 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 60
- 91% higher Pixel density: 513 ppi vs 269 ppi
- 63% higher Peak brightness: 2,600 nits vs 1,600 nits
- 40% lower thickness: 7.7 mm vs 12.9 mm
- Lower launch price: $1,000 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 61
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 47
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 49% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.7 ″
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S24+ | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 10 ″+49% |
| Panel type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 513 ppi+91% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits+63% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 91.6 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S24+ | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 1,914,857Top 43% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 637,914Top 36% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 562,338Top 47% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 289,405Top 48% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 425,200Top 46% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,250Top 25% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,900Top 24% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256/512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S24+ | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 12 MP+20% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S24+ | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,900 mAh | 5,600 mAh+14% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 12 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S24+ | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 196 g+37% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm+40% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S24+ | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S24+ | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S24+ | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S24+vs REDMI Note 17 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S24+vs Honor X80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S24+vs Asus ROG Phone 8 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S24+vs Huawei Mate 70 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS