Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Tecno Camon Slim 4G
80Performance28.9
66.7Display73
74Camera34.1
65.8Battery62.4
94.7Features49.3
8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra5 spec wins — Tecno Camon Slim 4G
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 74.8 to 47.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+51) and features (+45). Tecno Camon Slim 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 80 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 34
- Stronger battery score: 66 vs 62
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 49
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Reasons to pick the Tecno Camon Slim 4G
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 67
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 33% higher Wired charging: 60 W vs 45 W
- 22% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 8.2 mm
- 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 | 1224x2720 |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi+13% | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | 92.5 %+5% | 87.7 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| AnTuTu | 2,787,981Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 895,141Top 11% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 989,555Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 348,188Top 27% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 555,097Top 27% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,030Top 13% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,800Top 8% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | — |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 5 x | — |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP+167% |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh+12% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 60 W+33% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 13 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 218 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 6.4 mm+22% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Titanium | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 16 (HiOS 16.2) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+133% | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs HONOR 600 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)VSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6 LiteVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs OPPO A7 Pro 5GVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs Honor 90VSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs Infinix NOTE 40 Pro+ 5GVS