Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
80Performance28.9
66.7Display79.4
74Camera30.1
65.8Battery59.6
94.7Features60
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra7 spec wins — TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 74.8 to 48.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+51) and camera (+44). TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+ still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 80 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 66 vs 60
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 60
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Reasons to pick the TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
- Stronger display score: 79 vs 67
- 100% higher Wireless charging: 30 W vs 15 W
- 73% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 2,600 nits
- 27% lower weight: 160 g vs 218 g
- 21% lower thickness: 6.5 mm vs 8.2 mm
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 | 1224x2720 |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi+13% | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | 92.5 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Helio G200 |
| AnTuTu | 2,787,981Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 895,141Top 11% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 989,555Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 348,188Top 27% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 555,097Top 27% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,030Top 13% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,800Top 8% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | — |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 5 x | — |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 13 MP+8% |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh+4% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
| Active use endurance | 13 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 218 g | 160 g+27% |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 6.5 mm+21% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP64 |
| Frame material | Titanium | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | — |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | HiOS 15.1 (Android 15) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs HONOR 600 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)VSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSTECNO SPARK 40 Pro+vs iQOO Z9x 5GVSTECNO SPARK 40 Pro+vs Ulefone Armor 24 ProVSTECNO SPARK 40 Pro+vs Vivo S2VSTECNO SPARK 40 Pro+vs vivo Y400 5GVS