Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X300
80Performance85.4
66.7Display73.5
74Camera78.1
65.8Battery87.2
94.7Features84
5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra10 spec wins — Vivo X300
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 74.8, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+21) and display (+7). Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 84
- 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
- 40% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 5 years
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300
- Stronger performance score: 85 vs 80
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 67
- Stronger camera score: 78 vs 74
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 66
- 317% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+9% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi+8% | 461 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | 92.5 %+3% | 90.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,787,981Top 21% | 3,416,530 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 895,141Top 11% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 989,555Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 348,188Top 27% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 555,097Top 27% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,030Top 13% | 3,446+14%Top 7% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,800Top 8% | 9,843Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.68 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | 5 x+67% | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@120fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,040 mAh+21% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | 13 h | 17.5 h+35% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 218 g | 190 g+13% |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm+3% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Titanium | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+40% | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs HONOR 600 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)VSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X300vs OPPO Find X9 ProVSVivo X300vs OnePlus 15VSVivo X300vs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300vs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVS