Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs vivo Y400 Pro 5G
80Performance28.9
66.7Display69.8
74Camera34.1
65.8Battery67.5
94.7Features73.3
8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra6 spec wins — vivo Y400 Pro 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 74.8 to 50.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+51) and camera (+40). vivo Y400 Pro 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 80 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 34
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB
Reasons to pick the vivo Y400 Pro 5G
- Stronger display score: 70 vs 67
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 100% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 45 W
- 73% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 2,600 nits
- 17% lower weight: 182 g vs 218 g
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | vivo Y400 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.77 ″ |
| Panel type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 | 1080x2392 |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi+29% | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | 92.5 %+2% | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | vivo Y400 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
| AnTuTu | 2,787,981Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 895,141Top 11% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 989,555Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 348,188Top 27% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 555,097Top 27% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,030Top 13% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,800Top 8% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | vivo Y400 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | — |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 5 x | — |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP+167% |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | vivo Y400 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh+10% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 13 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | vivo Y400 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 218 g | 182 g+17% |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.5 mm+9% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP65 |
| Frame material | Titanium | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | vivo Y400 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | vivo Y400 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | vivo Y400 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs HONOR 600 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)VSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSvivo Y400 Pro 5Gvs Motorola Edge 50 NeoVSvivo Y400 Pro 5Gvs Motorola Moto G Stylus (2026)VSvivo Y400 Pro 5Gvs REDMI Note 15 ProVSvivo Y400 Pro 5Gvs OPPO Reno14 F 5GVS