Samsung Galaxy S25 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
75.3Performance64.4
61.3Display43.7
47.3Camera55.7
51.4Battery60.8
94.7Features60
5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S255 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 wins this phone face-off, 64.1 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+35) and display (+18). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 61 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 60
- 63% higher Peak brightness: 2,600 nits vs 1,600 nits
- 55% higher Pixel density: 416 ppi vs 269 ppi
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 51
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 80% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 25 W
- 61% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.2 ″
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.2 ″ | 10 ″+61% |
| Panel type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 416 ppi+55% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits+63% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 91.1 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 2,578,555Top 27% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 792,959Top 25% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 925,248Top 24% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 331,698Top 33% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 528,650Top 32% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950Top 16% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,400Top 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128/256/512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 12 MP+20% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh+40% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W+80% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 12 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 162 g+48% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+44% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S25vs Huawei Pura 90 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs OnePlus 15RVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs OnePlus 13sVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs OnePlus Turbo 6X ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS