Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
77.6Performance64.4
59.2Display43.7
42.1Camera55.7
59.7Battery60.8
94.7Features60
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 86 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 wins this phone face-off, 64.9 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+35) and display (+16). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
- Stronger performance score: 78 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 59 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 60
- 88% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,600 nits
- 49% higher Pixel density: 400 ppi vs 269 ppi
- Lower launch price: $1,200 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 42
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 80% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 25 W
- 45% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.9 ″
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 10 ″+45% |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2520 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi+49% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+88% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.1 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2600 (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy in the US, Canada and China) | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 2,477,554 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,977Top 14% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,466Top 5% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 38 %Bottom 2% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,300 mAh | 5,600 mAh+30% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W+80% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 14.2 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 180 g+42% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 13.1 mm | 12.9 mm+2% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 17 (One UI 9) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs realme 15 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Motorola Edge 70 FusionVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Motorola Edge 50 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Huawei nova 14 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS