Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Sharp AQUOS R11

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Sharp AQUOS R11
60.2Inno Score
64.4Performance46.7
43.7Display76.2
55.7Camera68.3
60.8Battery50.1
60Features73.3
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold8 spec wins — Sharp AQUOS R11

InnoReviews verdict

Sharp AQUOS R11 wins this phone face-off, 60.2 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+33) and features (+13). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 47
  • Stronger battery score: 61 vs 50
  • 298% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 54% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.5 ″
  • 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB

Reasons to pick the Sharp AQUOS R11

  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 68 vs 56
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
  • 403% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
  • 319% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldSharp AQUOS R11
Screen size10 ″+54%6.5 ″
Panel typeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XLTPO Pro IGZO OLED
Resolution2160x15841080x2340
Pixel density269 ppi396 ppi+47%
Refresh rate120 Hz240 Hz+100%
Peak brightness1,600 nits3,600 nits+125%
Screen-to-body—89.8 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldSharp AQUOS R11
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxyQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
RAM (max)16 GB+33%12 GB
Storage options512GB/1TB256/512GB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldSharp AQUOS R11
Main camera200 MP+298%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Ultra-wide12 MP50 MP+319%
Telephoto10 MP39 MP+285%
Optical zoom3 x+3%2.9 x
Max video—4K@30fps
Front camera10 MP50 MP+403%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldSharp AQUOS R11
Capacity5,600 mAh+10%5,100 mAh
Wired charging45 W+25%36 W
Wireless charging15 W—

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldSharp AQUOS R11
Weight309 g195 g+37%
Thickness12.9 mm8.9 mm+31%
IP ratingIP48IP68/IP69
Frame materialTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum FrameAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldSharp AQUOS R11
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
NFC—Yes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldSharp AQUOS R11
OS at launchAndroid 16 (One UI 8)Android 16
OS update pledge—3 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldSharp AQUOS R11
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VSSharp AQUOS R11vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FEVSSharp AQUOS R11vs HONOR 200 ProVSSharp AQUOS R11vs Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro MaxVSSharp AQUOS R11vs Huawei Pura 80VS

Try another matchup