Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
64.4Performance55.2
43.7Display53.7
55.7Camera46.8
60.8Battery94.7
60Features60
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold7 spec wins — Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 61.6 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+34) and display (+10). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 55
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 47
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.67 ″
- 34% lower thickness: 12.9 mm vs 19.4 mm
Reasons to pick the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 54 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 95 vs 61
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 233% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 15 W
- Lower launch price: $1,000 vs $2,899
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 10 ″+50% | 6.67 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2400 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 395 ppi+47% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 2,200 nits+38% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,158Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 7,082Top 22% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | — |
| Max video | — | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,600 mAh | 10,600 mAh+89% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 120 W+167% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 50 W+233% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 309 g+31% | 450 g |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm+34% | 19.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69K |
| Frame material | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 14 |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5mm jack | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs iPhone AirVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs Huawei Mate XT Ultimate DesignVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs iQOO Z9 TurboVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 UltraVS