Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo S2

WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
VS
Vivo S2
48.5Inno Score
64.4Performance28.9
43.7Display65.5
55.7Camera34.1
60.8Battery70.9
60Features57.3
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold6 spec wins — Vivo S2

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 48.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+36) and camera (+22). Vivo S2 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 34
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 46% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.83 ″

Reasons to pick the Vivo S2

  • Stronger display score: 66 vs 44
  • Stronger battery score: 71 vs 61
  • 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
  • 88% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,600 nits
  • 67% higher Pixel density: 449 ppi vs 269 ppi

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo S2
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo S2
Screen size10 ″+46%6.83 ″
Panel typeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X3D Curved AMOLED
Resolution2160x15841260x2800
Pixel density269 ppi449 ppi+67%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits3,000 nits+88%
Screen-to-body—91.4 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo S2
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo S2
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxyMediaTek Dimensity 7360-Turbo
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options512GB/1TB128/256GB
Storage type—UFS 3.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo S2
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo S2
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Ultra-wide12 MP—
Telephoto10 MP—
Optical zoom3 x—
Front camera10 MP32 MP+220%
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo S2
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo S2
Capacity5,600 mAh7,050 mAh+26%
Wired charging45 W+2%44 W
Wireless charging15 W—

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo S2
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo S2
Weight309 g197 g+36%
Thickness12.9 mm8 mm+38%
IP ratingIP48IP68/IP69
Frame materialTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum FramePlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo S2
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo S2
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFC—No
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo S2
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo S2
OS at launchAndroid 16 (One UI 8)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge—3 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo S2
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo S2
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup