Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs vivo T3 Ultra

WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
VS
vivo T3 Ultra
56.4Inno Score
64.4Performance45.1
43.7Display73.1
55.7Camera49.8
60.8Battery65.7
60Features52
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold6 spec wins — vivo T3 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 57.4 against 56.4 for vivo T3 Ultra. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges ahead in performance and features, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 45
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 50
  • Stronger features score: 60 vs 52
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP

Reasons to pick the vivo T3 Ultra

  • Stronger display score: 73 vs 44
  • Stronger battery score: 66 vs 61
  • 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
  • 181% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 1,600 nits
  • 78% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 45 W

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo T3 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo T3 Ultra
Screen size10 ″+47%6.78 ″
Panel typeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XAMOLED
Resolution2160x15841260x2800
Pixel density269 ppi452 ppi+68%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits4,500 nits+181%
Screen-to-body—90.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo T3 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo T3 Ultra
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxyMediaTek Dimensity 9200+
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,064Top 32%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—5,621Top 33%
RAM (max)16 GB+33%12 GB
Storage options512GB/1TB128/256GB
Storage type—UFS 3.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo T3 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo T3 Ultra
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.88
Ultra-wide12 MP+50%8 MP
Telephoto10 MP—
Optical zoom3 x—
Max video—4K@60fps
Front camera10 MP50 MP+400%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo T3 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo T3 Ultra
Capacity5,600 mAh+2%5,500 mAh
Wired charging45 W80 W+78%
Wireless charging15 W—

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo T3 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo T3 Ultra
Weight309 g192 g+38%
Thickness12.9 mm7.6 mm+41%
IP ratingIP48IP68
Frame materialTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum FramePlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo T3 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo T3 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFC—No
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo T3 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo T3 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16 (One UI 8)Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14)
OS update pledge—2 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo T3 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo T3 Ultra
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup