Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs vivo V40

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo V40
59.8Inno Score
64.4Performance26.1
43.7Display73
55.7Camera58.6
60.8Battery78.4
60Features100
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold7 spec wins — vivo V40

InnoReviews verdict

vivo V40 wins this phone face-off, 59.8 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+40) and display (+29). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 26
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 47% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.78 ″
  • 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB

Reasons to pick the vivo V40

  • Stronger display score: 73 vs 44
  • Stronger battery score: 78 vs 61
  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 60
  • 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
  • 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo V40
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo V40
Screen size10 ″+47%6.78 ″
Panel typeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XAMOLED
Resolution2160x15841260x2800
Pixel density269 ppi452 ppi+68%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits4,500 nits+181%
Screen-to-body—90.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo V40
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo V40
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxyQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Geekbench 6 (single)—1,178Bottom 47%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—3,208Bottom 44%
RAM (max)16 GB+33%12 GB
Storage options512GB/1TB128/256/512GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo V40
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo V40
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.88
Ultra-wide12 MP50 MP+317%
Telephoto10 MP—
Optical zoom3 x—
Max video—4K@30fps
Front camera10 MP50 MP+400%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo V40
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo V40
Capacity5,600 mAh+2%5,500 mAh
Wired charging45 W80 W+78%
Wireless charging15 W—
Active use endurance—15.1 h

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo V40
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo V40
Weight309 g190 g+39%
Thickness12.9 mm7.6 mm+41%
IP ratingIP48IP68/IP69
Frame materialTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum FramePlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo V40
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo V40
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFC—Yes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo V40
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo V40
OS at launchAndroid 16 (One UI 8)Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14)

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo V40
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo V40
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup