Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs vivo V40 Pro
64.4Performance40.6
43.7Display72.8
55.7Camera67.4
60.8Battery74.7
60Features86.7
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold8 spec wins — vivo V40 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
vivo V40 Pro wins this phone face-off, 63.8 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+29) and features (+27). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 41
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher Optical zoom: 3 x vs 2 x
- 47% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.78 ″
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
Reasons to pick the vivo V40 Pro
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 67 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 75 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 60
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo V40 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 10 ″+47% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 452 ppi+68% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 4,500 nits+181% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 89.9 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo V40 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 1,830Top 39% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 5,149Top 36% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo V40 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.88 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x+50% | 2 x |
| Max video | — | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo V40 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,600 mAh+2% | 5,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 80 W+78% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Active use endurance | — | 13.8 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo V40 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 309 g | 192 g+38% |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 7.6 mm+41% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo V40 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo V40 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14) |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo V40 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VSvivo V40 Provs Google Pixel 9 Pro XLVSvivo V40 Provs Xiaomi 13 UltraVSvivo V40 Provs iPhone 16 ProVSvivo V40 Provs Nothing Phone (4a) ProVS