Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs vivo X Fold3 Pro
64.4Performance54.5
43.7Display71.4
55.7Camera66.4
60.8Battery82.5
60Features65.3
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold10 spec wins — vivo X Fold3 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X Fold3 Pro wins this phone face-off, 67 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+28) and battery (+22). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 55
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 25% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 8.03 ″
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the vivo X Fold3 Pro
- Stronger display score: 71 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 65 vs 60
- 540% higher telephoto: 64 MP vs 10 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X Fold3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 10 ″+25% | 8.03 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2200x2480 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 412 ppi+53% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 4,500 nits+181% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X Fold3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,193Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 6,791Top 25% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X Fold3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.68 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 64 MP+540% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | — | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP+220% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X Fold3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,600 mAh | 5,700 mAh+2% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 100 W+122% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 50 W+233% |
| Active use endurance | — | 13.4 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X Fold3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 309 g | 236 g+24% |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 11.2 mm+13% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IPX8 |
| Frame material | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X Fold3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X Fold3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X Fold3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VSvivo X Fold3 Provs Google Pixel 10 Pro XLVSvivo X Fold3 Provs vivo X200TVSvivo X Fold3 Provs vivo X Fold5VSvivo X Fold3 Provs Xiaomi 14VS