Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs vivo X Fold5

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X Fold5
66.9Inno Score
64.4Performance52.9
43.7Display71.7
55.7Camera63
60.8Battery80.9
60Features78.7
2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold10 spec wins — vivo X Fold5

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X Fold5 wins this phone face-off, 66.9 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+28) and battery (+20). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 53
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 25% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 8.03 ″

Reasons to pick the vivo X Fold5

  • Stronger display score: 72 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 63 vs 56
  • Stronger battery score: 81 vs 61
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 60
  • 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo X Fold5
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo X Fold5
Screen size10 ″+25%8.03 ″
Panel typeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XFoldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution2160x15842200x2480
Pixel density269 ppi413 ppi+54%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits4,500 nits+181%
Screen-to-body—90.9 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo X Fold5
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo X Fold5
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxyQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,154Top 29%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—6,483Top 29%
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options512GB/1TB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo X Fold5
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo X Fold5
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.57
Ultra-wide12 MP50 MP+317%
Telephoto10 MP50 MP+400%
Optical zoom3 x3 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera10 MP20 MP+100%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo X Fold5
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo X Fold5
Capacity5,600 mAh6,000 mAh+7%
Wired charging45 W80 W+78%
Wireless charging15 W40 W+167%
Active use endurance—13.4 h

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo X Fold5
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo X Fold5
Weight309 g217 g+30%
Thickness12.9 mm9.2 mm+29%
IP ratingIP48IP58/IP59
Frame materialTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum FrameAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo X Fold5
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo X Fold5
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFC—Yes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo X Fold5
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo X Fold5
OS at launchAndroid 16 (One UI 8)Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15, OriginOS 5 in China)
OS update pledge—4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo X Fold5
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo X Fold5
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup