Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo X100 Pro
64.4Performance66.2
43.7Display64.3
55.7Camera68.1
60.8Battery79.6
60Features65.3
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold10 spec wins — Vivo X100 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X100 Pro wins this phone face-off, 68.8 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+21) and battery (+19). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 47% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.78 ″
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the Vivo X100 Pro
- Stronger display score: 64 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 68 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 65 vs 60
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- Lower launch price: $1,099 vs $2,899
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X100 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 10 ″+47% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 452 ppi+68% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 3,000 nits+88% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 89.9 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X100 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,200,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,200Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 7,600Top 20% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X100 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.75 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 4.3 x+43% |
| Max video | — | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP+220% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X100 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,600 mAh+4% | 5,400 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 100 W+122% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 50 W+233% |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X100 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 309 g | 221 g+28% |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 8.9 mm+31% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X100 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X100 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X100 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VSVivo X100 Provs OPPO Find X7VSVivo X100 Provs realme GT 7TVSVivo X100 Provs Xiaomi 14T ProVSVivo X100 Provs Huawei Mate 70 Pro+VS