Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs vivo X100 Ultra
64.4Performance64.4
43.7Display67.6
55.7Camera75.8
60.8Battery75.5
60Features86.7
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold10 spec wins — vivo X100 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X100 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 71.8 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+27) and display (+24). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 47% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.78 ″
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the vivo X100 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 68 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 76 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 60
- 1900% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 10 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X100 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 10 ″+47% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1440x3200 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 517 ppi+92% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 3,000 nits+88% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 89.8 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X100 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X100 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.75 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP+1900% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3.7 x+23% |
| Max video | — | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X100 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,600 mAh+2% | 5,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 80 W+78% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
| Active use endurance | — | 12.9 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X100 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 309 g | 229 g+26% |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 9.2 mm+28% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X100 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X100 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 14 (OriginOS 4) |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X100 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VSvivo X100 Ultravs Honor Magic V Flip2VSvivo X100 Ultravs Honor 500VSvivo X100 Ultravs POCO F7 UltraVSvivo X100 Ultravs Asus ROG Phone 9 ProVS