Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs vivo X200 FE
64.4Performance51.2
43.7Display76.3
55.7Camera60.5
60.8Battery85.5
60Features78.7
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold8 spec wins — vivo X200 FE
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 FE wins this phone face-off, 67.7 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+33) and battery (+25). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 51
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 58% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.31 ″
- 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 FE
- Stronger display score: 76 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 61 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 86 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 60
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 10 ″+58% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 460 ppi+71% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 5,000 nits+213% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.2 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 1,960Top 35% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 6,606Top 27% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 60 %Bottom 22% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.88 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP+50% | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | — | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,600 mAh | 6,500 mAh+16% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Active use endurance | — | 15.3 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 309 g | 186 g+40% |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 8 mm+38% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VSvivo X200 FEvs Samsung Galaxy S26VSvivo X200 FEvs REDMI K80 UltraVSvivo X200 FEvs Nothing Phone (3)VSvivo X200 FEvs Vivo X300 EVS