Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs vivo X200 Pro mini
64.4Performance71.3
43.7Display73.8
55.7Camera65.5
60.8Battery74.7
60Features86.7
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold10 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+30) and features (+27). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 58% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.31 ″
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini
- Stronger performance score: 71 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 75 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 60
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 10 ″+58% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 460 ppi+71% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 4,500 nits+181% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,439,691Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 716,503Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 837,229Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 328,282Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 557,677Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,589Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 8,078Top 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 48 %Bottom 7% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | — | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP+220% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,600 mAh | 5,700 mAh+2% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 309 g | 187 g+39% |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 8.2 mm+37% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VSvivo X200 Pro minivs Google Pixel 11 Pro XLVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Huawei nova 16 UltraVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iQOO 15RVS