Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo X300 E

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 E
67.9Inno Score
64.4Performance46.7
43.7Display84
55.7Camera60.5
60.8Battery81.6
60Features86.7
5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold9 spec wins — Vivo X300 E

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 E wins this phone face-off, 67.9 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+40) and features (+27). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 47
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 52% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.59 ″
  • 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
  • 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 E

  • Stronger display score: 84 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 61 vs 56
  • Stronger battery score: 82 vs 61
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 60
  • 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo X300 E
Screen size10 ″+52%6.59 ″
Panel typeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XAMOLED
Resolution2160x15841260x2750
Pixel density269 ppi459 ppi+71%
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness1,600 nits5,000 nits+213%

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo X300 E
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxyQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
RAM (max)16 GB+33%12 GB
Storage options512GB/1TB256/512GB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo X300 E
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Ultra-wide12 MP+50%8 MP
Telephoto10 MP50 MP+400%
Optical zoom3 x3 x
Front camera10 MP50 MP+400%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo X300 E
Capacity5,600 mAh7,200 mAh+29%
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging15 W—

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo X300 E
Weight309 g200 g+35%
Thickness12.9 mm7.8 mm+40%
IP ratingIP48IP68/IP69
Frame materialTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum FrameAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo X300 E
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFC—Yes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo X300 E
OS at launchAndroid 16 (One UI 8)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldVivo X300 E
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup