Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs vivo Y200 Pro 5G
64.4Performance28.9
43.7Display51.6
55.7Camera44.1
60.8Battery52.1
60Features46.7
7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold4 spec wins — vivo Y200 Pro 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 42.9, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+36) and features (+13). vivo Y200 Pro 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 52
- Stronger features score: 60 vs 47
- 213% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 64 MP
Reasons to pick the vivo Y200 Pro 5G
- Stronger display score: 52 vs 44
- 60% higher Front camera: 16 MP vs 10 MP
- 44% higher Pixel density: 388 ppi vs 269 ppi
- 44% lower weight: 172 g vs 309 g
- 42% lower thickness: 7.5 mm vs 12.9 mm
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo Y200 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 10 ″+47% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2400 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 388 ppi+44% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits+23% | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo Y200 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 128GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo Y200 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+213% | 64 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.79 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | — |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | — |
| Max video | — | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP+60% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo Y200 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,600 mAh+12% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W+2% | 44 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo Y200 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 309 g | 172 g+44% |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 7.5 mm+42% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP54 |
| Frame material | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo Y200 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo Y200 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14) |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | vivo Y200 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VSvivo Y200 Pro 5Gvs Blackview BL7000 ProVSvivo Y200 Pro 5Gvs HONOR X8cVSvivo Y200 Pro 5Gvs Redmi 17 5GVSvivo Y200 Pro 5Gvs Redmi Note 17VS