Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs vivo Y300 5G

WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
VS
vivo Y300 5G
46.3Inno Score
64.4Performance28.9
43.7Display56.3
55.7Camera34.1
60.8Battery61
60Features73.3
5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold6 spec wins — vivo Y300 5G

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 46.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+36) and camera (+22). vivo Y300 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 34
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 50% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.67 ″

Reasons to pick the vivo Y300 5G

  • Stronger display score: 56 vs 44
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
  • 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
  • 78% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 45 W
  • 46% higher Pixel density: 394 ppi vs 269 ppi

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo Y300 5G
Screen size10 ″+50%6.67 ″
Panel typeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XAMOLED
Resolution2160x15841080x2400
Pixel density269 ppi394 ppi+46%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits1,800 nits+13%
Screen-to-body—91.9 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo Y300 5G
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxyQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options512GB/1TB128/256GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo Y300 5G
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Ultra-wide12 MP—
Telephoto10 MP—
Optical zoom3 x—
Max video—1080p
Front camera10 MP32 MP+220%
OISYes—

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo Y300 5G
Capacity5,600 mAh+12%5,000 mAh
Wired charging45 W80 W+78%
Wireless charging15 W—

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo Y300 5G
Weight309 g188 g+39%
Thickness12.9 mm7.8 mm+40%
IP ratingIP48IP64
Frame materialTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo Y300 5G
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.0
NFC—No
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo Y300 5G
OS at launchAndroid 16 (One UI 8)Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14)

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo Y300 5G
Stereo speakers—Yes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup