Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Xiaomi 17

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17

Xiaomi

Xiaomi 17
80.2Inno Score
64.4Performance87
43.7Display68.8
55.7Camera68.6
60.8Battery91
60Features84
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold10 spec wins — Xiaomi 17

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi 17 wins this phone face-off, 80.2 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+30) and display (+25). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 59% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.3 ″
  • 15% higher Optical zoom: 3 x vs 2.6 x

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 64
  • Stronger display score: 69 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 69 vs 56
  • Stronger battery score: 91 vs 61
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17
Screen size10 ″+59%6.3 ″
Panel typeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2160x15841220x2656
Pixel density269 ppi464 ppi+72%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits3,500 nits+119%
Screen-to-body—91.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxySnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—3,248,535Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—921,447Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,191,470Top 11%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—473,607Top 5%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—662,011Top 9%
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,559Top 5%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,459Top 6%
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options512GB/1TB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.67
Ultra-wide12 MP50 MP+317%
Telephoto10 MP50 MP+400%
Optical zoom3 x+15%2.6 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera10 MP50 MP+400%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17
Capacity5,600 mAh6,330 mAh+13%
Wired charging45 W100 W+122%
Wireless charging15 W50 W+233%
Active use endurance—21.3 h

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17
Weight309 g191 g+38%
Thickness12.9 mm8.1 mm+38%
IP ratingIP48IP68
Frame materialTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum FrameAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFC—Yes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17
OS at launchAndroid 16 (One UI 8)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)
OS update pledge—5 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup