TECNO SPARK 40 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
28.9Performance87.6
77.8Display67.4
30.1Camera77
54.3Battery81
60Features100
5 spec wins — TECNO SPARK 40 Pro7 spec wins — Xiaomi 17 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Xiaomi 17 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 81.4 to 47.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+59) and camera (+47). TECNO SPARK 40 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
- Stronger display score: 78 vs 67
- 29% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 3,500 nits
- 22% lower weight: 170 g vs 219 g
- 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 19% lower thickness: 6.7 mm vs 8.3 mm
Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 88 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 77 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 81 vs 54
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 60
- 285% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 13 MP
Display
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.78 ″ | 6.9 ″+2% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1200x2608 |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi+6% | 416 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits+29% | 3,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 89.3 % | 92.3 %+3% |
Performance
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| AnTuTu | — | 3,600,724Top 6% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 1,032,276Top 6% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,345,109Top 6% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 495,988Top 2% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 727,351Top 6% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | — | f/1.67 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 4.3 x |
| Max video | 1440p@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP+285% |
| OIS | — | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,000 mAh+15% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | — | 50 W |
Design
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 170 g+22% | 219 g |
| Thickness | 6.7 mm+19% | 8.3 mm |
| IP rating | IP64 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (HiOS 15) | Android 16 (HyperOS 3) |
Audio
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
TECNO SPARK 40 Provs Infinix NOTE 40X 5GVSTECNO SPARK 40 Provs Infinix NOTE 50VSTECNO SPARK 40 Provs vivo V50 LiteVSTECNO SPARK 40 Provs iPhone 13 ProVSXiaomi 17 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSXiaomi 17 Ultravs Xiaomi 17T ProVSXiaomi 17 Ultravs OnePlus 15VSXiaomi 17 Ultravs Vivo X300 ProVS

