Skip to content
InnoReviews

Vivo X300 E vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Vivo X300 E
67.9Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
81.4Inno Score
46.7Performance87.6
84Display67.4
60.5Camera77
81.6Battery81
86.7Features100
6 spec wins — Vivo X300 E6 spec wins — Xiaomi 17 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi 17 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 81.4 to 67.9, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+41) and camera (+17). Vivo X300 E still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 E

  • Stronger display score: 84 vs 67
  • 43% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 20% higher capacity: 7,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
  • 10% higher Pixel density: 459 ppi vs 416 ppi

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 88 vs 47
  • Stronger camera score: 77 vs 61
  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 87
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
  • 300% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 50 MP

Display

Display comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17 Ultra
Screen size6.59 ″6.9 ″+5%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1260x27501200x2608
Pixel density459 ppi+10%416 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits+43%3,500 nits
Screen-to-body—92.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17 Ultra
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—3,600,724Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—1,032,276Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,345,109Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—495,988Top 2%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—727,351Top 6%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.67
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom3 x4.3 x+43%
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17 Ultra
Capacity7,200 mAh+20%6,000 mAh
Wired charging90 W90 W
Wireless charging—50 W

Design

Design comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17 Ultra
Weight200 g+9%219 g
Thickness7.8 mm+6%8.3 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16 (OriginOS 6)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)

Audio

Audio comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup