Skip to content
InnoReviews

vivo X300 FE vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

vivo X300 FE
73Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
82.2Inno Score
67.9Performance88.1
76.7Display67.4
60.5Camera73.3
84Battery95
84Features86.7
6 spec wins — vivo X300 FE9 spec wins — Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max wins this phone face-off, 82.2 to 73, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+20) and camera (+13). vivo X300 FE still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the vivo X300 FE

  • Stronger display score: 77 vs 67
  • 43% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • 28% higher Wild Life Extreme stability: 77 % vs 60 %
  • 13% lower weight: 191 g vs 219 g
  • 11% higher Pixel density: 460 ppi vs 416 ppi

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

  • Stronger performance score: 88 vs 68
  • Stronger camera score: 73 vs 61
  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 84
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
  • 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x

Display

Display comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17 Pro Max
Screen size6.31 ″6.9 ″+9%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1216x26401200x2608
Pixel density460 ppi+11%416 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits+43%3,500 nits
Screen-to-body—92.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17 Pro Max
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—3,543,388
Geekbench 6 (single)2,857Top 18%3,528+23%Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)9,276Top 13%10,600+14%Top 5%
Wild Life Extreme stability77 %+28%Bottom 45%60 %Bottom 22%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17 Pro Max
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.57f/1.7
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto50 MP50 MP
Optical zoom3 x5 x+67%
Max video8K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17 Pro Max
Capacity6,500 mAh7,500 mAh+15%
Wired charging90 W100 W+11%
Wireless charging40 W50 W+25%
Active use endurance—20.8 h

Design

Design comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17 Pro Max
Weight191 g+13%219 g
Thickness8 mm8 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17 Pro Max
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17 Pro Max
OS at launchAndroid 16 (OriginOS 6)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)
OS update pledge5 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17 Pro Max
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup