Skip to content
InnoReviews

Vivo X300 vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

Vivo X300
81.8Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
82.2Inno Score
85.4Performance88.1
73.5Display67.4
78.1Camera73.3
87.2Battery95
84Features86.7
6 spec wins — Vivo X30010 spec wins — Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Vivo X300 scores 81.8 against 82.2 for Xiaomi 17 Pro Max. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Xiaomi 17 Pro Max edges ahead in battery and features, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300

  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 67
  • Stronger camera score: 78 vs 73
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 29% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • 13% lower weight: 190 g vs 219 g

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 87
  • 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
  • 25% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 40 W
  • 24% higher capacity: 7,500 mAh vs 6,040 mAh
  • 19% higher Active use endurance: 20.8 h vs 17.5 h

Display

Display comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Screen size6.31 ″6.9 ″+9%
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1216x26401200x2608
Pixel density461 ppi+11%416 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+29%3,500 nits
Screen-to-body90.1 %92.3 %+2%

Performance

Performance comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu3,416,5303,543,388+4%
Geekbench 6 (single)3,446Top 12%3,528+2%Top 10%
Geekbench 6 (multi)9,843Top 14%10,600+8%Top 9%
Wild Life Extreme stability—60 %Bottom 35%
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options256/512GB/1TB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.68f/1.7
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto50 MP50 MP
Optical zoom3 x5 x+67%
Max video4K@120fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Capacity6,040 mAh7,500 mAh+24%
Wired charging90 W100 W+11%
Wireless charging40 W50 W+25%
Active use endurance17.5 h20.8 h+19%

Design

Design comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Weight190 g+13%219 g
Thickness8 mm+1%8 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
OS at launchAndroid 16 (OriginOS 6)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)
OS update pledge5 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup