Skip to content
InnoReviews

Vivo X300 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

WINNER
Vivo X300
81.8Inno Score
VS
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
81.4Inno Score
85.4Performance87.6
73.5Display67.4
78.1Camera77
87.2Battery81
84Features100
6 spec wins — Vivo X3005 spec wins — Xiaomi 17 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Vivo X300 scores 81.8 against 81.4 for Xiaomi 17 Ultra. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Vivo X300 edges ahead in battery and display, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300

  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 67
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 81
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 29% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • 13% lower weight: 190 g vs 219 g

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 84
  • 300% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 43% higher Optical zoom: 4.3 x vs 3 x
  • 25% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 40 W

Display

Display comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Screen size6.31 ″6.9 ″+9%
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1216x26401200x2608
Pixel density461 ppi+11%416 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+29%3,500 nits
Screen-to-body90.1 %92.3 %+2%

Performance

Performance comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared3,416,5303,600,724Top 11%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—1,032,276Top 11%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,345,109Top 11%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—495,988Top 3%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—727,351Top 11%
Geekbench 6 (single)3,446Top 12%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)9,843Top 14%—
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options256/512GB/1TB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.68f/1.67
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom3 x4.3 x+43%
Max video4K@120fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Capacity6,040 mAh+1%6,000 mAh
Wired charging90 W90 W
Wireless charging40 W50 W+25%
Active use endurance17.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Weight190 g+13%219 g
Thickness8 mm+4%8.3 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16 (OriginOS 6)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)
OS update pledge5 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Vivo X300 versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup