Skip to content
InnoReviews

Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 18 Fold

WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
VS
Xiaomi 18 Fold
79.3Inno Score
86.9Performance91.6
74.3Display67
75.8Camera71.9
83.3Battery76.6
84Features86.7
11 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro6 spec wins — Xiaomi 18 Fold

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 79.3, pulling ahead mainly in display (+7) and battery (+7). Xiaomi 18 Fold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 67
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 72
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 77
  • 300% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 213% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 16 MP

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 18 Fold

  • Stronger performance score: 92 vs 87
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 36% higher AnTuTu: 4,811,636 vs 3,533,222
  • 25% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 40 W
  • 24% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 12,758 vs 10,264

Display

Display comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 18 Fold
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 18 Fold
Screen size6.78 ″7.58 ″+12%
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution1260x28002364x1672
Pixel density452 ppi+18%382 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+13%4,000 nits
Screen-to-body91.6 %+1%90.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 18 Fold
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 18 Fold
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500Xiaomi XRing O3
AnTuTu3,533,2224,811,636+36%
Geekbench 6 (single)3,473+1%Top 11%3,448Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,264Top 12%12,758+24%Top 2%
Wild Life Extreme stability59 %Bottom 29%—
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options256/512GB/1TB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 18 Fold
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 18 Fold
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.57f/1.7
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto200 MP+300%50 MP
Optical zoom3.7 x+6%3.5 x
Max video8K@30fps8K@24fps
Front camera50 MP+213%16 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 18 Fold
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 18 Fold
Capacity6,510 mAh+9%6,000 mAh
Wired charging90 W+34%67 W
Wireless charging40 W50 W+25%
Active use endurance12.8 h—

Design

Design comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 18 Fold
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 18 Fold
Weight226 g219 g+3%
Thickness8 mm+25%10.7 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP58/IP59
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 18 Fold
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 18 Fold
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 18 Fold
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 18 Fold
OS at launchAndroid 16 (OriginOS 6)Android 17 (HyperOS 4)
OS update pledge5 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 18 Fold
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 18 Fold
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup