Apple A12 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200
30.5CPU39.3
30.2GPU35.5
46.6Benchmarks57.3
20AI—
41.8Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Apple A12 Bionic8 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 34.3, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+25) and benchmarks (+11). Apple A12 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A12 Bionic
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 31
- Stronger GPU score: 36 vs 30
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 42
- 53% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,100,000 vs 720,000
General
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018 | 2022 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+33% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.3 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.49 GHz Vortex + 4x1.52 GHz Tempest | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.49 GHz | 2.8 GHz+12% |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Neural Engine (8-core) | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 5 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Intel XMM 7560 LTE (external) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | Retina XDR | — |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 720,000Top 46% | 1,100,000+53%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,100Top 42% | 1,600+45%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,800Top 49% | 4,150+48%Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,450Top 66% | 2,100+45%Top 51% |
Related comparisons
Apple A12 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860VSApple A12 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSApple A12 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSApple A12 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS
