Apple A12 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2600
30.5CPU72.6
30.2GPU77.4
46.6Benchmarks81.1
20AIspec-based—
41.8Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Apple A12 Bionic6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 34.3, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+47) and CPU (+42). Apple A12 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A12 Bionic
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 31
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 30
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 47
- 399% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 1,450
- 287% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 2,800
General
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018 | 2026 |
| Process | 7 nm | 2 nm+71% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.3 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.49 GHz Vortex + 4x1.52 GHz Tempest | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.49 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Neural Engine (8-core) | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 5 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Intel XMM 7560 LTE (external) | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | Retina XDR | — |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 720,000 | 2,827,538Top 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 24% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,100Top 46% | 2,995+172%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,800Bottom 48% | 10,824+287%Top 5% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,450Bottom 37% | 7,230+399%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
Apple A12 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860VSApple A12 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5VSApple A12 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSApple A12 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

