Apple A14 Bionic vs Huawei Kirin T90A
46CPU34.4
35.1GPU28.4
53.6Benchmarks—
41.1AIspec-based—
63.2Efficiencyspec-based—
4 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T90A
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A14 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.9 to 31.7, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+12) and GPU (+7). Huawei Kirin T90A still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 35 vs 28
- 69% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,080 vs 1,229
- 66% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,050 vs 1,233
- 23% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,900 vs 3,987
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T90A
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2024 |
| Process | 5 nm | — |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | ARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510) |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 1x2.5 GHz Big + 3x2.2 GHz Mid + 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A510 Little |
| Max clock | 3 GHz+20% | 2.5 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | HiSilicon Maleoon 910 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | — |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 950,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,080+69%Top 18% | 1,229Top 37% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,900+23%Top 24% | 3,987Top 33% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,050+66%Top 44% | 1,233Bottom 39% |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2200VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSHuawei Kirin T90Avs Huawei Kirin 9010VSHuawei Kirin T90Avs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732GVSHuawei Kirin T90Avs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GVSHuawei Kirin T90Avs MediaTek Helio G99VS
