Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2500
46CPU57.2
35.1GPU54.3
53.6Benchmarks74.2
41.1AI85.9
63.2Efficiency79.6
1 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic9 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 46.9, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+45) and benchmarks (+21). Apple A14 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- 25% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 46
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 35
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 54
- Stronger AI score: 86 vs 41
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 63
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2025 |
| Process | 5 nm | 3 nm+40% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+25% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz+10% |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | 59 TOPS+436% |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 950,000Top 34% | 2,150,000+126%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,080Top 17% | 2,300+11%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,900Top 23% | 8,200+67%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,050Top 53% | 4,400+115%Top 17% |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2200VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

