Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9610
46CPU28
35.1GPU—
53.6Benchmarks—
41.1AIspec-based—
63.2Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 28
- 50% lower process: 5 nm vs 10 nm
- 30% higher Max clock: 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2018 |
| Process | 5 nm+50% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 3 GHz+30% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR4X |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Max download | — | 0.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | WQXGA (2560x1600) |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 950,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,080Top 18% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,900Top 24% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,050Top 44% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2200VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Samsung Exynos 9611VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVS

