Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2500
49.1CPU57.9
36.5GPU54
50.3Benchmarks73.1
50.7AI85.9
60.7Efficiency79.6
2 spec wins — Apple A15 Bionic8 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66 to 48.1, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+35) and benchmarks (+23). Apple A15 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A15 Bionic
- 12% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 58 vs 49
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 37
- Stronger benchmarks score: 73 vs 50
- Stronger AI score: 86 vs 51
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 61
General
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2025 |
| Process | 5 nm | 3 nm+40% |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+12% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.5 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.24 GHz + 4x2.01 GHz | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.24 GHz | 3.3 GHz+2% |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4/5-core) | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 16 TOPS | 59 TOPS+273% |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X60) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,150,000 | 2,150,000+87% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,320+1% | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 5,650 | 8,200+45% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,650 | 4,400+66% |
Related comparisons
Apple A15 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1VSApple A15 Bionicvs Google Tensor G4VSApple A15 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSApple A15 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

