Apple A16 Bionic vs Huawei Kirin 9000S
56.5CPU24.9
41GPU26.1
54.8Benchmarks33.3
52.7AI0
71.4Efficiency34.5
7 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 54.1 to 28.7, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+53) and efficiency (+37). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 25
- Stronger GPU score: 41 vs 26
- Stronger benchmarks score: 55 vs 33
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 35
- 150% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 1,050
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm+43% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+32% | 2.62 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Maleoon 910 |
| GPU clock | — | 750 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000+81% | 720,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+150% | 1,050 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+99% | 3,300 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100+138% | 1,300 |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Google TensorVS

