Apple A16 Bionic vs Huawei Kirin 9000S
56.8CPU32
43.7GPU31.3
61.5Benchmarks46.6
52.7AI—
71.4Efficiency34.5
7 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+37) and CPU (+25). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 32
- Stronger GPU score: 44 vs 31
- Stronger benchmarks score: 62 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 35
- 150% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 1,050
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm+43% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+32% | 2.62 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Maleoon 910 |
| GPU clock | — | 750 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000+81%Top 23% | 720,000Top 46% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+150%Top 11% | 1,050Top 44% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+99%Top 15% | 3,300Top 38% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100+138%Top 36% | 1,300Top 68% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS

