Apple A16 Bionic vs Huawei Kirin 9020
56.8CPU36.1
43.7GPU36.8
61.5Benchmarks—
52.7AIspec-based—
71.4Efficiencyspec-based20
5 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9020
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 32.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+21) and GPU (+7). Huawei Kirin 9020 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 36
- Stronger GPU score: 44 vs 37
- 104% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 1,285
- 63% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,100 vs 1,907
- 46% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,570 vs 4,505
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9020
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9020 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2024 |
| Process | 4 nm+43% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | ARM (in-house HiSilicon cores) |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9020 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x2.5 GHz HiSilicon Big + 3x2.15 GHz HiSilicon Mid + 4x1.6 GHz HiSilicon Little |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+38% | 2.5 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9020 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | HiSilicon Maleoon 920 |
| GPU clock | — | 840 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9020 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9020 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9020 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9020 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9020 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,300,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+104%Top 13% | 1,285Top 40% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+46%Top 17% | 4,505Top 29% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100+63%Top 38% | 1,907Bottom 48% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs MediaTek Dimensity 7100VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs Unisoc Tiger T760VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1VS
