Apple A16 Bionic vs Huawei Kirin 9030S
56.8CPU37.6
43.7GPU31.5
61.5Benchmarks61.4
52.7AIspec-based—
71.4Efficiencyspec-based—
5 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9030S
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 41.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+19) and GPU (+12). Huawei Kirin 9030S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 38
- Stronger GPU score: 44 vs 32
- 96% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 1,336
- 93% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,100 vs 1,606
- 45% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,570 vs 4,522
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9030S
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9030S |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | ARM (Taishan V124 cores) |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9030S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x2.7 GHz Taishan V124 Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan V124 Mid + 4x1.62 GHz Taishan V124 Little |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+28% | 2.7 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9030S |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | — |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9030S |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9030S |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9030S |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9030S |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9030S |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,300,000+1% | 1,293,328 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+96%Top 13% | 1,336Top 38% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+45%Top 17% | 4,522Top 29% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100+93%Top 38% | 1,606Bottom 43% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSHuawei Kirin 9030Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9030Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9030Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSHuawei Kirin 9030Svs Google TensorVS
