Apple A16 Bionic vs Huawei Kirin T90A
56.8CPU34.4
43.7GPU28.4
61.5Benchmarks—
52.7AIspec-based—
71.4Efficiencyspec-based—
4 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T90A
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 31.7, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+22) and GPU (+15). Huawei Kirin T90A still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 44 vs 28
- 151% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,100 vs 1,233
- 113% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 1,229
- 65% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,570 vs 3,987
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T90A
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2024 |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | ARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510) |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x2.5 GHz Big + 3x2.2 GHz Mid + 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A510 Little |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+38% | 2.5 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | HiSilicon Maleoon 910 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | — |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin T90A |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,300,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+113%Top 12% | 1,229Top 37% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+65%Top 16% | 3,987Top 33% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100+151%Top 34% | 1,233Bottom 39% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSHuawei Kirin T90Avs Huawei Kirin 9010VSHuawei Kirin T90Avs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732GVSHuawei Kirin T90Avs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GVSHuawei Kirin T90Avs MediaTek Helio G99VS
