Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2100
56.8CPU37.1
43.7GPU34.2
61.5Benchmarks47.5
52.7AI64
71.4Efficiency55.9
8 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 44, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+20) and efficiency (+16). Samsung Exynos 2100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 37
- Stronger GPU score: 44 vs 34
- Stronger benchmarks score: 62 vs 48
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 56
- 107% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,100 vs 1,500
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
- Stronger AI score: 64 vs 53
- 53% higher AI performance: 26 TOPS vs 17 TOPS
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2021 |
| Process | 4 nm+20% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+19% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | — | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | 26 TOPS+53% |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000+74%Top 23% | 746,547Top 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+83%Top 11% | 1,430Top 30% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+85%Top 15% | 3,550Top 34% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100+107%Top 36% | 1,500Top 65% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 252,025Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 127,819Top 72% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 144,909Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 221,794Top 78% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS

