Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2100
56.5CPU31.2
41GPU29.3
54.8Benchmarks39.3
52.7AI64
71.4Efficiency55.9
8 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 54.1 to 39.4, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+25) and efficiency (+16). Samsung Exynos 2100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 31
- Stronger GPU score: 41 vs 29
- Stronger benchmarks score: 55 vs 39
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 56
- 107% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,100 vs 1,500
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
- Stronger AI score: 64 vs 53
- 53% higher AI performance: 26 TOPS vs 17 TOPS
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2021 |
| Process | 4 nm+20% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+19% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | — | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | 26 TOPS+53% |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000+53% | 850,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+83% | 1,430 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+85% | 3,550 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100+107% | 1,500 |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS

