Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9610
56.8CPU28
43.7GPU—
61.5Benchmarks—
52.7AIspec-based—
71.4Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 28
- 60% lower process: 4 nm vs 10 nm
- 50% higher Max clock: 3.46 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2018 |
| Process | 4 nm+60% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+50% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR4X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Max download | — | 0.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | WQXGA (2560x1600) |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,300,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620Top 12% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570Top 16% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100Top 34% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Samsung Exynos 9611VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVS

