Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9820
56.8CPU39.5
43.7GPU—
61.5Benchmarks—
52.7AIspec-based—
71.4Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9820
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9820 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 40
- 50% lower process: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 27% higher Max clock: 3.46 GHz vs 2.73 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9820
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2018 |
| Process | 4 nm+50% | 8 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 + 2x2.31 GHz Cortex-A75 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+27% | 2.73 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G76 MP12 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR4X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated LTE Cat-20 |
| Max download | — | 2 Gbps |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | WQUXGA (3840x2400) |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,300,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620Top 12% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570Top 16% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100Top 34% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 9820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865VSSamsung Exynos 9820vs Huawei Kirin 990 5GVSSamsung Exynos 9820vs Samsung Exynos 990VSSamsung Exynos 9820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVS

